AMD StoreMI Review | NDTV

AMD StoreMI Review | NDTV

At the start of this yr, AMD introduced a partnership with enterprise storage administration firm Enmotus, bringing a tiered storage acceleration system called FuzeDrive to customers of its Ryzen and Ryzen Threadripper desktop CPUs. It’s an apparent parallel to Intel’s Optane Memory effort and Apple’s Fusion Drive, basically letting customers just about mix the strengths of a fast however low-capacity SSD with a gradual however massive exhausting drive. In all these implementations, the 2 totally different media are thought of by the PC to be a single storage location, and file accesses are drastically sped up by ensuring that the info you want is pre-emptively swapped onto the SSD.

Before we might even had the prospect to get acquainted with FuzeDrive, AMD introduced that it was rolling out a brand new model beneath its own StoreMI brand. FuzeDrive was an elective additional priced at $19.99 (roughly Rs. 1,376), however StoreMI is free with all second-gen 400-series motherboards. This makes it much more tempting, however it’s nonetheless extremely prone to fly beneath the radar for a lot of customers.

We’re going to arrange StoreMI and test how a lot of a distinction it actually makes, and whether or not that is one thing that dwelling customers and fans ought to be concerned with.

AMD StoreMI necessities and options

StoreMI works by creating one digital drive with two bodily areas. As far as Windows is worried, it is simply enterprise as typical. StoreMI is not a small cache like Optane Memory. Instead, it is conceptually known as tiered storage. The emphasis right here is on machine studying algorithms that resolve what’s (or will quickly be) essential sufficient to be moved to the sooner storage tier.

While Intel’s Optane Memory drives are constructed utilizing a very different kind of flash memory and have to be paired with a SATA exhausting drive or SSD, AMD says that StoreMI can membership any two drives. The choices embody SATA and NVMe SSDs, exhausting drives, blocks of RAM, and even Optane . The profit is barely actually felt if you happen to use two totally different courses of storage; one gradual and one quick. That might be an SSD and exhausting drive, and even one superfast NVMe SSD and one other extra reasonably priced SATA one for area.

StoreMI is totally free so long as you are utilizing a 400-series motherboard, and because of AMD’s coverage of supporting multiple generations of processors, it’ll work with Ryzen in addition to older Athlon and A-series CPUs. If you’ve gotten a 300-series motherboard, you possibly can nonetheless pay $19.99 for FuzeDrive Basic. StoreMI limits your sooner drive to 256GB, however if you wish to use as much as a 1TB SSD, you possibly can pay $59.99 (roughly Rs. four,130) for FuzeDrive Plus as an alternative.

You also can select to make use of as much as 2GB of your system RAM (4GB with FuzeDrive Plus) as a FuzeRAM cache. This can provide you a further velocity enhance, however Enmotus says the extent of it will differ relying on workloads. StoreMI itself requires a minimal of 4GB of system RAM, and 2GB over and above that to allow FuzeRAM.

AMD is fast to level out that StoreMI shouldn’t be about caching knowledge, which implies that it doesn’t use your SSD to be able to speed up reads and writes which might be focused on the exhausting drive. It additionally is not like RAID, which splits knowledge evenly between pairs of an identical drives to be able to velocity up reads and writes. Instead, it creates a single quantity and simply decides what knowledge ought to be routed to which bodily system, or tier.

So what occurs if you happen to lose energy, or if both drive fails? According to Enmotus, you will not have any hassle throughout common operations. Even if StoreMI is shuffling knowledge between the 2 bodily drives within the background, a sudden energy loss will not trigger corruption. However, you don’t have any method of figuring out what knowledge is on which drive, so a backup strategy in case of bodily failure is of the utmost significance.

AMD StoreMI setup and efficiency

For our exams, we used an AMD Ryzen 7 2700X processor and Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi motherboard, with 16GB of G.Skill DDR4-3400 RAM, a Radeon RX Vega 64 graphics card, Corsair RM650 energy provide, and AMD’s personal Wraith Prism LED cooler. Our two goal drives are a 250GB Samsung SSD 860 Evo (SATA M.2) and a 2TB WD Blue exhausting drive, each supplied model new and factory-sealed by AMD for the aim of this overview.

We put in a recent copy of Windows 10 with all the most recent updates onto the HDD and ran our first exams. We then added the SSD to our system and enabled StoreMI. Everything essential to boot our PC was mechanically moved to the SSD as a part of the optimisation course of. You also can do that the opposite method round, beginning together with your boot drive and including one other storage medium. Later, we examined simply the SSD as a boot drive to quantify the efficiency distinction you possibly can anticipate if you happen to’re upgrading with a recent Windows set up as an alternative.

You’ll must download the latest version of StoreMI from AMD’s web site. At first, the StoreMI installer give up on us repeatedly claiming disk controller was both not discovered or set to the fallacious mode in our motherboard’s BIOS. It turned out that every one we needed to do was initialise the exhausting drive utilizing the Windows Disk Manager and eject our Windows set up USB drive, which is a a lot easier repair. We additionally needed to obtain and set up Java as a part of the set up course of.

amd storemi setup warning ndtv storemi


After one reboot, set up was full. It was then only a matter of following just a few steps on display screen to flip the 2 separate drives into one tiered quantity. We needed to verify that the 2 drives have been appropriately detected as “Fast” and “Slow”, after which click on ‘Yes’ on a dialogue field that popped as much as inform us of fundamental precautions similar to backing up our knowledge and ensuring that Windows would not attempt to set up updates in the course of the method.

Our 250GB SSD (232GB successfully) and 2TB SSD (1.86TB successfully) have been detected as a single 2.1TB quantity after the reboot. This is fascinating, as a result of Optane Memory would not get added to the capability of the exhausting drive you might be accelerating.

The StoreMI app interface is not very user-friendly. The design is dated, and never all buttons and choices are labelled clearly. You can select whether or not the StoreMI quantity you create shall be bootable or not, and there is a lengthy record of warnings and directions – run Chkdsk, be certain that no Windows updates are pending, again up all knowledge, and test the BIOS boot order for the drives being mixed. In a later step, the time period TierDrive is used to confer with the ensuing StoreMI quantity, which may confuse customers. If AMD needs StoreMI for use by informal customers and never simply fans, the UI must be much more polished.

We used CrystalDiskMark to judge the efficiency of the SSD alone, the SSD and HDD with StoreMI, and the HDD alone. We additionally checked out how StoreMI works with the FuzeRAM cache enabled.

Unsurprisingly, outcomes for the Samsung SSD 860 Evo have been on par with what we bought after we reviewed the 2.5-inch 1TB version of this same drive. Sequential reads and writes got here in at 556.8MBps and 516.7MBps respectively, which is about as a lot as a SATA SSD can obtain. In distinction, the exhausting drive was able to 129MBps and 133.6MBps respectively. That alone illustrates the distinction even a fundamental SSD could make to PC velocity and responsiveness.

amd storemi crystaldiskmark2 ndtv storemi

CrystalDiskMark 6 learn and write velocity check outcomes


With StoreMI enabled, we have been capable of get 495MBps and 519.1MBps respectively – not fairly nearly as good as an SSD by itself, however an enormous step up from a tough drive, with out the inconvenience of getting to reinstall Windows. With the FuzeRAM cache turned on, we bought a staggering results of 4797.7MBps for sequential reads, however a middling 511.3MBps for sequential writes.

amd storemi file copy2 ndtv storemi

Windows 10 file copy check outcomes (31.4GB of various recordsdata)


As we all know although, sequential speeds do not all the time mirror real-world utilization. CrystalDiskMark additionally studies random 4K reads and writes. At a queue depth of 1, which skews in direction of the strengths of spinning exhausting drives, our WD Blue HDD gave us zero.469MBps and 1.468MBps reads and writes, whereas the Samsung SSD 860 Evo gave us 49.51MBps and 109.9MBps respectively. With StoreMI, the numbers have been 45.71MBps and 93.04MBps, whereas StoreMI plus the RAM cache delivered 360.7MBps and 86.08MBps respectively. The cache would possibly make reads an order of magnitude sooner, however there’s a small penalty for writes.

We observed a lot the identical development with our different exams. We used PassMark AppTimer to test how shortly a easy Windows program could be launched, utilizing the Internet Explorer executable throughout three makes an attempt. We additionally timed our check PC booting from a very powered down state thrice. Finally, we copied a 31.4GB folder of various recordsdata from an exterior Samsung SSD T1 drive and famous the time in addition to tempo utilizing a stopwatch.

Just to see what would possibly occur, we tried disconnecting the exhausting drive (on which we had put in Windows earlier than enabling StoreMI), solely to be greeted by an error. The PC merely grew to become unbootable. Disabling StoreMI took over six hours, and once you do that, all knowledge is moved over to the bigger of the 2 drives. We have been capable of take away the SSD after which boot with none hassle. Interestingly, traces of the software program remained even after uninstalling it – Windows nonetheless thought it was booting from a phantom StoreMI quantity.

amd storemi unbootable ndtv storemiError message after eradicating one bodily drive with StoreMI nonetheless enabled


We ought to notice that as with all machine studying instruments, it’d take a while for StoreMI to succeed in its full potential on any PC. Once you are loaded with apps and knowledge, it might be a problem for the system to find out what can go the place. The advantages may even be most obvious once you use a heavy app repeatedly.

It’s instantly apparent that StoreMI is much more versatile than Optane Memory, to not point out much more accessible because it’s free and would not rely on particular and costly . It will work very effectively for individuals who have a small SSD that is not getting used optimally, or who need the very best efficiency with a particularly constrained funds. It is also a straightforward and non-disruptive method to improve a PC with a 400-series motherboard someplace down the road. There are many permutations and combos that may work, and we will not probably check all of them. In specific, you would possibly think about using StoreMI for a non-boot drive.

On the opposite hand, it is not a blanket enchancment over utilizing an HDD and an SSD independently. If you do not thoughts placing within the effort to manually transfer issues from one drive to a different, you get higher velocity and the good thing about figuring out precisely what’s the place. That makes backups simpler, and one drive failure will not carry the opposite one down.

One factor that AMD and Enmotus want to deal with is the software program’s UI and documentation. Right now, we would not really feel snug recommending StoreMI to anybody who is not intimately conversant in constructing and tinkering with PCs. If you assume that you simply match that description, StoreMI is a fairly fascinating value-add to an already interesting desktop platform.


Price: Free (with any 400-series motherboard)


  • Works with any mixture of storage units
  • Improves efficiency of exhausting drives
  • Free


  • Confusing UI
  • Slower than utilizing a SSD by itself

Ratings (Out of 5)

  • Performance: four
  • Value for Money: 5
  • Overall: four

Adapted From: Gadgets360

Leave a Comment for this TechXP Article